Prudential reaches settlement in Malaysian dividend dispute
announced on Thursday that it has reached a full and final settlement in its legal dispute with Malaysian firm Detik Ria over dividend claims related to its joint venture in the country, bringing an end to proceedings that sought over $800m in payouts.
The FTSE 100 company said Detik Ria, which holds a 49% stake in Sri Han Suria (SHS) - the holding company of Prudential Assurance Malaysia - had launched legal proceedings in April seeking dividends equivalent to about $833m plus interest.
Under the terms of the settlement, SHS would pay Detik Ria a dividend of $83m, funded from existing resources.
As part of the agreement, Prudential said it also waived a $33m receivable owed by Detik Ria to one of its subsidiaries, stemming from a prior Federal Court decision.
All legal proceedings would be withdrawn, and the parties agreed to a mutual release of liability for all historical claims.
The settlement was governed by the laws of England and Wales and subject to arbitration in Singapore.
Prudential said the unaudited financial impact of the agreement was expected to result in a small increase to IFRS shareholder equity.
Its group financial statements would continue to reflect a 49% non-controlling interest for Detik Ria in PAMB.
At 1213 BST, shares in Prudential were up 2.66% at 963.2p.
Reporting by Josh White for Sharecast.com.
Disclaimer & Declaration of Interest
The information, investment views and recommendations in this article are provided for general information purposes only. Nothing in this article should be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial product relating to any companies under discussion or to engage in or refrain from doing so or engaging in any other transaction. Any opinions or comments are made to the best of the knowledge and belief of the writer but no responsibility is accepted for actions based on such opinions or comments. Vox Markets may receive payment from companies mentioned for enhanced profiling or publication presence. The writer may or may not hold investments in the companies under discussion.